And now for phase Two, the Jewish alternative.
"The Arabs, including and especially the Palestinian Arabs, have been the aggressors throughout the nearly 100 years of the Arab-Israel conflict."
This quote from Rachel Neuwirth's article confirms what I had already suspected about her. She represents a faction of Zionist thought that does not want peace, does not want a resolution, but wants vengance. It is a thought that does not serve Jews or Israelis nor humanity as a whole.
I say this after reading about Jewish approaches to religious peacebuilding and how Jews and Arab Muslims do not have to live in a cycle of violence. There does not have to be a question of a victor or a loser.
Marc Gopin is way cooler than Rachel Neuwirth, and people who want to read about the Jewish side of the conflict should check him out. My favorite piece of his comes from a sort of anthology of religious peacebuilding works entitled Faith Based Diplomacy edited by Douglas Johnston.
He talks about how the intensity of the human despair caused by the violent conflicts trumps the things that caused it. We can point to so many reasons and events that led to the violence, but because the casualties have been so devastating, deconstructing all of that won't really help. Each side's needs are equal to the other in importance.
One of the more creative ideas he has, the land that is fought over so bitterly can be used as a tool in building a relationship between the two sides. One of these ways draws on the shared tradition of memorializing the dead for Jews and Muslims. This should be done via a bilateral process and could be as simple as picking a place where violence has occurred and making it a communal mourning place. But it is something that needs happen organically and over an extended period of time. The absence of judgement is key. The focus needs to be on the loss of life no matter what the reason was.
He also highlights a plan for resolving the conflict. These points include involving religious leaders in the peace process, resotring the sanctity of Holy places, engaging in joint mourning, supporting injured adversaries, develop trust-building initiatives, developing a process for restoring justices, combatting poverty, restoring dignity, and engage religious traditions in transforming relationships.
For a more detailed plan within Jewish theology to fix it all, google him and read whatever you find about him.
Now, I can imagine Mr. Snarfquack reading one or two sentences of all this and ignoring it and quite possibly responding with his pre-scripted diatribe of how I'm no better than a terrorist or Nazi, and that's fine. The world is full of Snarfquacks who are too far into their own perceptions that they can't reason with anything else, and so are consistently irrational in their responses and annoying to everyone else. I wouldn't bother to write so much about all this just because a Snarfquack sent it to my inbox. No, I'm writing all this because I want people to read something level headed and peace oriented on this subject. If all this makes me a Nazi terrorist who drinks the blood of Jewish babies, then the discussion ends and I continue to not care what you think of me.
Because your name is Snarfquack. Fo' realz.
Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Combating Disfigurations, Part Two
Posted by The Odalisque at 10:33 PM
Labels: israel, jews, marc gopin, muslims, palestine, rachel neuwirth, religion and peacebuilding
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Great Piece. More people need to read this!
I am afraid it is you, Ms. Odalisque, who wants vengeance. You certainly do now want to hear the truth..the truth hurts, ha?
This piece by you in nothing more than vacuous and lack any intellectual arguments, regretfully.
Post a Comment